From the Kingdom of Cambodia land law

From the Kingdom of Cambodia land law

Third the value of the ownership of the segment

First the value added by the behavior of the small segment
        Ninety-sixth: if there is no evidence to the contrary, in the ground or underground construction, the project should be regarded as its owner to pay, complete, the results of his.
        Ninety-seventh: such as construction, factory or improved materials do not belong to the owner of the land, he shall pay the material costs of material owners. If the owner is to destroy the material, it shall be liable for compensation, but the owner of the material shall not have the right to remove the completed project.
Article ninety-eighth: such as the third party building materials with malicious and improved, the land owners have the right to choose to retain the material or ordered third party to remove.
       If the owner of the land requires removal of malicious construction, the third party shall be free to pay the demolition costs; such as the demolition of the land owner caused any damage, the compensation should be. If the owner wants to keep the building, the material and labor costs must be paid, regardless of whether the land will be added to the building. However, if the third party in accordance with the law of thirty-eighth well intentioned construction, the owner can not request the removal of the above building. He has two options, either to pay the cost of material and labor, or to pay the equivalent of the land value of the price of gold.
Second small segment artificial value added
       Ninety-ninth: rivers, tributaries of river silt can be considered in alluvial soil. Alluvial soil should benefit the owner of the land along the river, whether or not it is accessible or not. If it is navigable or floating, the owner shall retain the river towpath.
       100th: because the flow of water from the river to the other side of the alluvial soil, the other side of the land owner to benefit from the alluvial soil, the loss of the owner of the soil can not be returned.
       Article 101st: if rivers, tributaries or channels, whether it can sail or floating, due to a sudden flood caused discernible large area of riparian land loss into the downstream or across the land lost in the owner within one year after the return of land; exceeding this limit, unless the owner of the land has been obtained no longer holds, or to request.
       102nd: in a tributary or channel in the newly formed navigable or floating any land value should belong to the state.
       103rd: in the tributaries, channels or in the river in the new form of non navigation or floating in any land value should belong to the owners of riparian land. If the land value added fails to form a bank in a row, the owner of both sides of the Strait should be the center of the river.
       Article 104th: if rivers, tributaries or channels formed a new channel segmentation and took the owner of the land bank, and the formation of islands, rivers, tributaries or even in the channel islands is independent of the original land owners still have ownership.
       105th: if you can sail or float the river, tributary or channel to the formation of a new waste water channel, the owner of the bank can get the dry river, tributary or channel ownership. Should the request of a provincial or municipal competent authority or an interested party, the land value of the original waterway shall be determined by the expert appointed by the court of the province or city of the land.
If the original riparian land owners do not want to be experts in the pricing of land, the competent authorities should open auction. Auction proceeds shall be distributed among the owners of the flooded land.


  Back